Subscribe to get weekly updated delivered directly to your inbox!
Consultations, feedback, and events
- ION LIGHT RAIL: Cambridge extension public consultations, online due Dec 31
- UNIVERSITY AVE: Streetscape public consultation
- LONG TERM: Goals for transportation in the Greater Golden Horseshoe
- REGIONAL: Public input session Dec 5
- KITCHNER: Online budget feedback, due Jan 5
Making sense of the census
On Wednesday, the final results of the 2016 Census were released, including commute to work information. For transit in Waterloo Region, it was good news: the share of commutes to work via transit continue to grow steadily, in spite of overall GRT ridership numbers being down from a peak in 2013. This confirms Regional planners’ theory that much of the post-2013 decline in ridership came from the school boards switching to using yellow buses for high school students. The climb in transit share and relatively steady share of car trips as passengers also seems to poke holes in the theory that people are being lured out of buses by ride-hailing services like Uber.
For cycling and walking, the news wasn’t as great – these modes are used for getting to work at about the same rate as in 2011, while other cities like Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, and Calgary made huge gains in cycling mode share. Some local media personalities questioned whether recent cycling infrastructure investments are worth it if we’ve seen little net movement in mode share over the last two decades.
It’s worth noting two major factors at play here: the lack of a coherent all-ages-and-abilities cycling network, and suburban sprawl. Our cycling network is largely a patchwork of disconnected and all too often, poorly designed facilities. Our cities and Region maintain their own separate plans for facilities on their own roads, and new facilities have often only been added or improved as part of existing road work, rather than in a systematic way to build out a network. (On this front, the Region’s segregated bike lane pilot shows promise.) Our growing urban boundaries (only recently have we begun to develop more in our cores than at the fringes) mean that destinations are harder to reach by bike. We have been literally moving the goalposts further and further away – it’s amazing we’ve been able to keep pace at all.
The Saturday’s Record editorial remains confident that light rail will continue to boost transit ridership, even as it misunderstands some comments about parking made by TriTAG member Mike Boos to their columnist. If we want to enable more people to shift habits, we’ve got to change the incentives for driving and parking everywhere, not just in our downtowns.
Editor’s note: we should also bear in mind the census numbers we have are limited to commutes to work. In 2011, trips between home and work accounted for less than 30% of all weekday trips taken in Waterloo Region.
Despite being promised more light rail vehicles by Thanksgiving, the Region still only has possession of two cars. Bombardier will be hosting a media event this week in Kingston, where they apparently will give reporters a ride on our third train. We’re not impressed: if Bombardier wants to show the world how capable they are of building light rail vehicles, they should deliver them as promised. Thankfully, train #4 is apparently getting ready to come our way soon.
Following the provincial Tories’ plan to take over the subway system, the Toronto Board of Trade proposed merging all transit systems in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, and Waterloo, into one big ‘Superlinx’ network. The idea has been dismissed by local leaders, and by researchers, planners, and commentators.
Greyhound has announced cuts to trips between Kitchener and Guelph. Sean Marshall looks at the sorry state of Ontario’s inter-city bus system.
Public consultations for the Region’s separated bike lane pilot take place December 12 and 14. The Region appears to be favouring the area enclosed by the Waterloop trail system as the initial pilot, which includes parts of Uptown, Northdale, Laurier, and the east campus of UW. But with the Region’s scoring system showing this neighbourhood as neck-and-neck with downtown Kitchener, we have to ask, why not do both?
The latest local cycling facility screw-up takes place on Glasgow in Kitchener, where speed bumps have been placed over the bike lanes. We get that the city wants to remove the incentive for cars to drive into the bike lane to avoid the speed bump, but there are better ways to achieve this. Meanwhile in Waterloo, Uptown King Street has reopened to fanfare, but the much-anticipated protected bike lanes have been hogged by drivers and their parked cars.
- What makes a city great for cycling (Momentum)
- London’s protected bike lanes move people 5 times more efficiently than car lanes (Streetsblog)
- What will it take to close the gender gap in urban cycling (Fast Company)
- Someone fixed a dangerous Toronto intersection with a bunch of leaves (BlogTO)
- Advocates slam city’s ‘pay as you go’ road safety plan (The Star)
- A system of safe, human-centred streets (Strong Towns)
- Streets wide shut – a principle for urban streets (Transportist)
Kitchener is planning to spend $10 million on a new downtown parking garage for roughly 500 cars in the next decade. That’s $3.9 million more than it plans on spending on its Cycling Master Plan over the course of more than 20 years.
- To reduce pollution, London will outlaw parking construction (Streetsblog)
- Portland’s parking-policy successes will get a go now in California (MobilityLab)
- Manulife plans 25-storey building in downtown Kitchener parking lot (CBC)
- How Kitchener should grow up (The Record)
- Creating streets people can identify with (Urban Land Magazine)
- Who’s to blame for drive-to urbanism (Streetsblog)
The road ahead
- Congestion pricing was unpopular in Stockholm – until people saw it in action (Streetsblog)
- Uber and Lyft should pay for the streets (CityLab)
- Plan to curb solo drivers in Cambridge (CTV)